4.4 Article

Fusion-evaporation cross-sections for the 64Ni+100Mo reaction using the dynamical cluster-decay model

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/36/8/085105

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The decay of hot and rotating compound nucleus 164Yb*, formed in heavy ion reaction Ni-64+Mo-100 at both below- and above-barrier energies, is studied on the basis of the dynamical cluster-decay model (DCM) with effects of deformations and orientations of nuclei included in it. There is only one parameter in this model, namely the neck-length parameter, which varies smoothly with the temperature of the compound nucleus at both below- and above-barrier energies, and its value remains within the range of validity of the proximity potential. The emission of light particles (xn, x- neutrons, x = 1-4) as well as the energetically favoured intermediate mass fragments (IMFs) of both the light (5 <= A(2) <= 20) and heavy (40 <= A(2) <= 50) masses, together with the symmetric fission (SF) channel ((A/2) +/- 20), is considered as the dynamical collective mass motions of preformed fragments or clusters through the barrier. The light-mass IMFs, the heavy-mass fragments (HMFs) and SF, constituting the fusion-fission (ff) cross-section, contribute only at above-barrier energies, and are compatible with the CASCADE analysis of experimental data. A best fit to data is obtained for two different neck-length parameters, one for light particles (LPs) and another for all other decay channels, the ff cross-section. The barrier height corresponding to the neck-length parameter for LPs gives 'barrier lowering' in a straightforward way for the best-fitted fusion evaporation cross-sections in DCM, and, in contrast to the (statistical model) analysis of experimental data, results in largest contribution for 1n emission. A further study is called for both the LPs and ff channels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available