4.2 Article

High-intensity stepwise conditioning programme for improved exercise responses and agility performance of a badminton player with knee pain

Journal

PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 80-85

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.06.005

Keywords

Patellar tendinosis; Knee injury; Fatigue training; Endurance training

Funding

  1. Sports Injury Prevention and Performance Optimization Unit (Hong Kong Jockey Club, Hong Kong SAR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the effect of a high-intensity stepwise conditioning programme combined with multiple recovery measures on physical fitness, agility, and knee pain symptoms of an injured player. Design: A single case study. Setting: University-based conditioning training laboratory. Participants: One 26-year-old male world-class badminton player (height, 190.0 cm; weight, 793 kg; left dominant hand; playing experience, 16 years; former world champion) with patellar tendinosis and calcification of his left knee. High-conditioning stepwise conditioning programme: The player received seven conditioning sessions over three weeks. During the programme, there was a gradual increase in training duration and load across sessions while cold therapy, manual stretches and massage were administered after each session to minimise inflammation. Main outcome measures: The training outcome was evaluated with three different testing methods: standard step test, badminton-specific agility test, and tension-pain rating. Results: The conditioning programme reduced knee pain symptoms and improved actual performance and cardiopulmonary fitness during the agility task. The player was able to return to sport and compete within a month. Conclusions: A high-intensity stepwise conditioning programme improved the physical fitness while sufficient recovery measures minimised any possible undesirable effects and promoted faster return to elite level competition. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available