4.6 Article

Investigation of the imaging quality of synchrotron-based phase-contrast mammographic tomography

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 47, Issue 36, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/36/365401

Keywords

phase-contrast imaging; phase retrieval; computed tomography; mammography

Funding

  1. International Synchrotron Access Program (ISAP) - Australian Government
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  3. ARC Australian Research Fellowship [DP110101941, DP130104913]
  4. University of New England

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the results of a systematic study of phase-contrast x-ray computed tomography in the propagation-based and analyser-based modes using specially designed phantoms and excised breast tissue samples. The study is aimed at the quantitative evaluation and subsequent optimization, with respect to detection of small tumours in breast tissue, of the effects of phase contrast and phase retrieval on key imaging parameters, such as spatial resolution, contrast-to-noise ratio, x-ray dose and a recently proposed 'intrinsic quality' characteristic which combines the image noise with the spatial resolution. We demonstrate that some of the methods evaluated in this work lead to substantial (more than 20-fold) improvement in the contrast-to-noise and intrinsic quality of the reconstructed tomographic images compared with conventional techniques, with the measured characteristics being in good agreement with the corresponding theoretical estimations. This improvement also corresponds to an approximately 400-fold reduction in the x-ray dose, compared with conventional absorption-based tomography, without a loss in the imaging quality. The results of this study confirm and quantify the significant potential benefits achievable in three-dimensional mammography using x-ray phase-contrast imaging and phase-retrieval techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available