4.6 Article

Optimized fabrication of high-quality La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 thin films considering all essential characteristics

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 44, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/44/20/205001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dutch Science Foundation
  2. NanoNed
  3. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
  4. European Science Foundation
  5. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-AC02-76SF00515]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, an overview of the fabrication and properties of high-quality La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 (LSMO) thin films is given. A high-quality LSMO film combines a smooth surface morphology with a large magnetization and a small residual resistivity, while avoiding precipitates and surface segregation. In the literature, typically only a few of these issues are adressed. We therefore present a thorough characterization of our films, which were grown by pulsed laser deposition. The films were characterized with reflection high energy electron diffraction, atomic force microscopy, x-ray diffraction, magnetization and transport measurements, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy. The films have a saturation magnetization of 4.0 mu(B)/Mn, a Curie temperature of 350K and a residual resistivity of 60 mu Omega cm. These results indicate that high-quality films, combining both large magnetization and small residual resistivity, were realized. A comparison between different samples presented in the literature shows that focussing on a single property is insufficient for the optimization of the deposition process. For high-quality films, all properties have to be adressed. For LSMO devices, the thin-film quality is crucial for the device performance. Therefore, this research is important for the application of LSMO in devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available