3.9 Article

Tailored electron bunches with smooth current profiles for enhanced transformer ratios in beam-driven acceleration

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.18.081301

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0011831, DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  2. Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Basic Research Award [HDTRA1-10-1-0051]
  3. Fermi Research Alliance, LLC
  4. dissertation-completion award - Graduate School of Northern Illinois University
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0011831] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Collinear high-gradient O(GV/m) beam-driven wakefield methods for charged-particle acceleration could be critical to the realization of compact, cost-efficient, accelerators, e.g., in support of TeV-scale lepton colliders or multiple-user free-electron laser facilities. To make these options viable, the high accelerating fields need to be complemented with large transformer ratios >2, a parameter characterizing the efficiency of the energy transfer between a wakefield-exciting drive bunch to an accelerated witness bunch. While several potential current distributions have been discussed, their practical realization appears challenging due to their often discontinuous nature. In this paper we propose several alternative continuously differentiable (smooth) current profiles which support enhanced transformer ratios. We especially demonstrate that one of the devised shapes can be implemented in a photo-emission electron source by properly shaping the photocathode-laser pulse. We finally discuss a possible superconducting linear-accelerator concept that could produce shaped drive bunches at high-repetition rates to drive a dielectric-wakefield accelerator with accelerating fields on the order of similar to 60 MV/m and a transformer ratio similar to 5 consistent with a recently proposed multiuser free-electron laser facility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available