4.8 Article

Updated Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order QCD Predictions for the Weak Radiative B-Meson Decays

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 114, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.221801

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [FOR 1873, Sonderforschungsbereich Transregio 9]
  2. State Committee of Science of Armenia [13-1c153]
  3. Volkswagen Stiftung Program [86426]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation
  5. National Science Centre (Poland) research project [DEC-2014/13/B/ST2/03969]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy, Division of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  7. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY-1417354]
  8. MIUR [2010YJ2NYW 006]
  9. STFC [ST/L000474/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000474/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Weak radiative decays of the B mesons belong to the most important flavor changing processes that provide constraints on physics at the TeV scale. In the derivation of such constraints, accurate standard model predictions for the inclusive branching ratios play a crucial role. In the current Letter we present an update of these predictions, incorporating all our results for the O(alpha(2)(s)) and lower-order perturbative corrections that have been calculated after 2006. New estimates of nonperturbative effects are taken into account, too. For the CP- and isospin-averaged branching ratios, we find B-s gamma = (3.36 +/- 0.23) x 10(-4) and B-d gamma = (1.73(-0.22)(+0.12)) x 10(-5), for E-gamma > 1.6 GeV. Both results remain in agreement with the current experimental averages. Normalizing their sum to the inclusive semileptonic branching ratio, we obtain R-gamma = (B-s gamma + B-d gamma)/B-clv= (3.31 +/- 0.22) x 10(-3). A new bound from B-s gamma on the charged Higgs boson mass in the two-Higgs-doublet-model II reads M-H +/- > 480 GeV at 95% C.L.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available