4.8 Article

Relativistic Coulomb Excitation within the Time Dependent Superfluid Local Density Approximation

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.012701

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. DOE [DE-FC02-07ER41457, DE-FG02-08ER41533]
  2. NSF [PHY-1415656, PHY-0922770]
  3. Polish National Science Centre (NCN) [DEC-2013/08/A/ST3/00708]
  4. ERANET-NuPNET grant SARFEN of the Polish National Centre for Research and Development (NCBiR)
  5. National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy at Los Alamos National Laboratory [DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  6. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  7. DOE Office of Science, Advanced Scientific Computing Research [58202]
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Physics [1415656] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Within the framework of the unrestricted time-dependent density functional theory, we present for the first time an analysis of the relativistic Coulomb excitation of the heavy deformed open shell nucleus U-238. The approach is based on the superfluid local density approximation formulated on a spatial lattice that can take into account coupling to the continuum, enabling self-consistent studies of superfluid dynamics of any nuclear shape. We compute the energy deposited in the target nucleus as a function of the impact parameter, finding it to be significantly larger than the estimate using the Goldhaber-Teller model. The isovector giant dipole resonance, the dipole pygmy resonance, and giant quadrupole modes are excited during the process. The one-body dissipation of collective dipole modes is shown to lead a damping width Gamma(down arrow) approximate to 0.4 MeV and the number of preequilibrium neutrons emitted has been quantified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available