4.8 Article

Exciton Quenching Due to Copper Diffusion Limits the Photocatalytic Activity of CdS/Cu2S Nanorod Heterostructures

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 590-596

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jz500041g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FP7-People-RG Marie Curie International Reintegration Grant (IRG),
  2. European Research Council [278779]
  3. I-CORE Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee
  4. Israel Science Foundation [152/11]
  5. Kreitman Foundation Fellowship
  6. Rieger Foundation Fellowship
  7. Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  8. Israeli Ministry of Economy Focal Technology Area Research Grant
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [278779] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formation of donor/acceptor junctions in hybrid nanomaterials is predicted to enhance photocatalytic activity as compared to single-component semiconductor systems. Specifically, nanomaterials containing a junction of n-type cadmium sulfide (CdS) and p-type copper sulfide (Cu2S) formed via cation exchange have been proposed as potential photocatalysts for reactions such as water splitting. Herein, we study the elemental distribution of Cu within these nanostructures using analytical transmission electron microscopy techniques. The resulting effects of this elemental distribution on photocatalytic activity and charge dynamics were further studied using a model photoreduction reaction and transient absorption spectroscopy. We find that copper diffusion in the hybrid nanostructure quenches the exciton lifetime and results in low photocatalytic activity; however, this effect can be partially mitigated via selective extraction. These results provide a deeper understanding of the physical processes within these hybrid nanostructures and will lead to more rational design of photocatalyst materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available