4.8 Article

Generalized Manning Condensation Model Captures the RNA Ion Atmosphere

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 114, Issue 25, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.258105

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [PHY-1427654, MCB-1214457, PHY-1216435]
  2. NIH [1R01GM110310-01A1]
  3. Welch Foundation [C-1792]
  4. NSF CAREER Award [MCB-1350312]
  5. National Institutes of Health [1R01GM110310-01A1]
  6. John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  7. CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research
  8. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas
  9. Cyberinfrastructure for Computational Research - NSF [CNS-0821727]
  10. Division Of Physics
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1427654] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  13. Direct For Biological Sciences [1214457] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RNA is highly sensitive to the ionic environment and typically requires Mg2+ to form compact structures. There is a need for models capable of describing the ion atmosphere surrounding RNA with quantitative accuracy. We present a model of RNA electrostatics and apply it within coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulation. The model treats Mg2+ ions explicitly to account for ion-ion correlations neglected by mean-field theories. Since mean-field theories capture KCl well, it is treated implicitly by a generalized Manning counterion condensation model. The model extends Manning condensation to deal with arbitrary RNA conformations, nonlimiting KCl concentrations, and the ion inaccessible volume of RNA. The model is tested against experimental measurements of the excess Mg2+ associated with the RNA, Gamma(2+), because Gamma(2+) is directly related to the Mg2+-RNA interaction free energy. The excellent agreement with experiment demonstrates that the model captures the ionic dependence of the RNA free energy landscape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available