4.8 Article

Molecular Miscibility of Polymer-Fullerene Blends

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 1, Issue 21, Pages 3160-3166

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jz101276h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Science, Division of Materials Science and Engineering [DE-FG02-98ER45737]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E051804/1, EP/G068356/1]
  3. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. EPSRC [EP/G068356/1, EP/E051804/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G068356/1, EP/E051804/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The device function of polymer bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells has been commonly interpreted to arise from charge separation at discrete interfaces between phase-separated materials and subsequent charge transport through these phases without consideration of phase purity. To probe composition, the miscibility of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and poly(2-methoxy-5-(3',7'-dimethyloctyloxy)-1,4-phenylenevinylene) (MDMO-PPV) with phenyl-C-61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) has been determined while the effects of polymer crystallinity on miscibility are probed using P3HT grades of varying regioregularity. It is found that, while no intercalation occurs in P3HT crystals, amorphous portions of P3HT and MDMO-PPV contain significant concentrations of PCBM calling into question models based on pure phases and discrete interfaces. Furthermore, depth profiles of P3HT/PCBM bilayers reveal that even short annealing causes significant interdiffusion of both materials, showing that under no conditions do pure amorphous phases exist in BHJ or annealed bilayer devices. These results suggest that current models of charge separation and transport must be refined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available