4.6 Article

Preferential Location of Coinage Metal Dopants (M = Ag or Cu) in [Au25-XMX(SC2H4Ph)18]- (x ∼ 1) As Determined by Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure and Density Functional Theory Calculations

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 118, Issue 43, Pages 25284-25290

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp5085372

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Funding Program for Next Generation World-leading Researchers (NEXT Program) [GR-003]
  2. Elements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts & Batteries (ESICB)
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [25102539, 25288009, 25288012, 26248003]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25288009, 25102539, 26620016, 25288012] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The preferential locations of Ag and Cu atoms in the initial stage of doping into [Au-25(SC2H4Ph)(18)](-) were studied by X-ray absorption spectroscopy and density functional theory computations. The extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectra of [Au23.8Ag1.2(SC2H4Ph)(18)](-) at the Ag K-edge were reproduced using a model structure in which the Ag dopant occupied a surface site in the icosahedral Au-13 core that was computationally the most stable site. In contrast, the Cu K-edge EXAFS spectra of [Au23.6Cu1.4(SC2H4Ph)(18)](-) indicated that the Cu dopant was preferentially located at the oligomer site that was computationally less stable than the surface site. This discrepancy between the Cu location experimentally determined and that theoretically predicted was explained in terms of variations in the stability of the Cu dopant at the two sites against aerobic oxidation. These results demonstrate that the mixing patterns of bimetallic clusters are determined not only by the thermodynamic stability but also by the durability of the mixed structure under synthetic and storage conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available