4.6 Article

Operando Characterization of an Amorphous Molybdenum Sulfide Nanoparticle Catalyst during the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 118, Issue 50, Pages 29252-29259

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp505394e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis [DE-SC0004993]
  2. Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  3. Center on Nanostructuring for Efficient Energy Conversion (CNEEC) at Stanford University, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001060]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  5. National Science Foundation [DGE-114747]
  6. Swedish Energy Agency
  7. Permascand AB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molybdenum sulfide structures, particularly amorphous MoS3 nanoparticles, are promising materials in the search for cost-effective and scalable water-splitting catalysts. Ex situ observations show that the nanoparticles exhibit a composition change from MoS3 to defective MoS2 when subjected to hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) conditions, raising questions regarding the active surface sites taking part in the reaction. We tracked the in situ transformation of amorphous MoS3 nanoparticles under HER conditions through ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and performed density functional theory studies of model MoSx systems. We demonstrate that, under operating conditions, surface sites are converted from MoS3 to MoS2 in a gradual manner and that the electrolytic current densities are proportional to the extent of the transformation. We also posit that it is the MoS2 edge-like sites that are active during HER, with the high activity of the catalyst being attributed to the increase in surface MoS2 edge-like sites after the reduction of MoS3 sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available