4.6 Article

CO Activation Pathways of Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis on χ-Fe5C2 (510): Direct versus Hydrogen-Assisted CO Dissociation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 118, Issue 19, Pages 10170-10176

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp502225r

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21306046]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M520041, 2013T60428]
  3. 111 Project of Ministry of Education of China [B08021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Iron carbides, especially chi-Fe5C2, among the active iron species in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS), are considered to be responsible for high FTS activity. CO activation pathways as the initial steps of FTS over chi-Fe5C2 were explored by spin-polarized density functional theory calculations. Surface energies of chi-Fe5C2 facets observed from the XRD patterns were first calculated, and then the corresponding equilibrium chi-Fe5C2 shape was obtained by Wulff construction. The thermodynamically stable (510) surface was predicted to have the largest percentage among the exposed crystal facets. Subsequently, the adsorption properties of CO on chi-Fe5C2 (510) were studied. Despite exhibiting lower binding energy than that at the 3F-4 site as the most stable configuration, CO adsorption at the 4F-1 site led to significant weakening of the C-O bond from both the structural and electronic properties' points of view. Furthermore, two kinds of CO activation mechanisms (i.e., the direct and H-assisted CO dissociation) and the corresponding six kinds of CO activation pathways on chi-Fe5C2 (510) were comparatively investigated on the basis of the evolution of carbon species, in which the C-O bond cleavage and further hydrogenation of surface species were concerned. The systematic analysis of the activation properties of CO suggests the direct CO dissociation as the preferred activation pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available