4.6 Article

Facile and Scalable Synthesis of Caterpillar-like ZnO Nanostructures with Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting Effect

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 118, Issue 25, Pages 13467-13475

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp503155c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Texas-Pan American
  2. American Chemical Society - Petroleum Research Fund [51497]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-12-1-0159]
  4. Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) of the U.S. Department of Defense [HDTRA1-10-1-0114]
  5. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [W31P4Q-12-1-009]
  6. Welch Foundation [BG-0017]
  7. National Science Foundation under DMR [0934157]
  8. DMR MRI [1040419]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In an effort to replace conventional multistep seeding methods to produce multidimensional ZnO nanostructures with high spatial occupancy of nanowires (NWs), a rational and facile synthesis protocol for caterpillar-like branched ZnO nanofibers (BZNs) is reported. This process combined the scalable forcespinning technology with a hydrothermal process to efficiently develop BZNs to substantially enhance surface area and roughness factor. Specifically, unbranched ZnO nanofibers were first prepared by spinning polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)/zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)(2)center dot 6H(2)O) composite fibers, followed by calcination at 500 degrees C. These fibers were deposited on flat substrates to serve as nonwoven netlike seed sites for hydrothermal growth of ultradense and uniform NW branches to form caterpillar-like BZNs. Their usage as photoanodes in photoelectrochemical water-splitting cells was evaluated, resulting in a photon-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of 0.165%, an enhancement of 147% when compared to ZnO NW arrays with similar dimensions. An enhanced light-harvesting process coupled with a facile and scalable synthetic procedure is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available