4.6 Article

Effect of Heat Treatment on the Lithium Ion Conduction of the LiBH4-Lil Solid Solution

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 117, Issue 7, Pages 3249-3257

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp310050g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Copenhagen Graduate School for Nano Science and Technology
  2. COST Action [MP1103]
  3. Danish Center for Scientific Computing (DCSC)
  4. Center of Atomic-Scale Materials Design (CAMD)
  5. Energy Research Fund of Landsvirkjun, Iceland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The LiBH4-Lil solid solution is a good Li+ conductor and a promising crystalline electrolyte for all-solid-state lithium based batteries. The focus of the present work is on the effect of heat treatment on the Li+ conduction. Solid solutions with a Lil content of 6.25-50% were synthesized by high-energy ball milling and annealed at 140 degrees C. Powder X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy were used for characterizing the samples and for comparing their crystallite sizes and the density of defects before and after the annealing. The Li+ conductivity was measured using impedance spectroscopy, resulting in conductivities exceeding 0.1 mS/cm at 30 degrees C and 10 mS/cm at 140 degrees C. It was found that the formation of defect-rich microstructures during ball milling increased the specific conductivities of these compounds significantly. The phase transition temperatures between the orthorhombic and hexagonal structures of LiBH4 were measured using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The measured transition temperatures range from 100 to -70 degrees C and show a linear decrease of 70 degrees C for every 10% of LiI addition up to a Lil content of 25%. The relative stability of the two structures was calculated using density functional theory, and together with the DSC measurements, the calculations were used to evaluate the change in entropic difference between the structures with LiI content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available