4.6 Article

Morphology Dependence of Catalytic Properties of Ni/CeO2 Nanostructures for Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 116, Issue 18, Pages 10009-10016

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp300543r

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51108258]
  2. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [10QA1402400]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [11nm0502200, 10540500100]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [J50102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The comparative catalytic activity and coke resistance are examined in carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Ni/CeO2 nanorods (NR) and nanopolyhedra (NP), The Ni/CeO2-NR catalysts display more excellent catalytic activity and higher coke resistance compared with the Ni/CeO2-NP. The high resolution transmission electron microscope reveals that the predominantly exposed planes are the unusually reactive {110} and {100} planes on the CeO2-NR rather than the stable {111} one on the CeO2-NP. The prepared samples were also characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, UV and visible Raman spectra, and oxygen temperature-programmed oxidation. The {110} and {100} planes show great superiority for the anchoring of Ni nanoparticles, which results in the existence of strong metal-support interaction effect (SMSI). The SMSI effect can be helpful to prevent sintering of Ni particles, which benefits to reduce the deactivation of catalytic activity. Besides, the oxygen vacancies and the mobility of lattice oxygen also show the morphology dependence. They can participate into the catalytic reaction and be beneficial to the activation of carbon deposition. In conclusion, the excellent catalytic activity and coke resistance of the Ni/CeO2-NR should be attributed to the SMSI effect and abundant oxygen vacancies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available