4.6 Article

Double Layer Structure of Ionic Liquids at the Au(111) Electrode Interface: An Atomic Force Microscopy Investigation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 115, Issue 14, Pages 6855-6863

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp200544b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP0986194]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SPP 1191]
  3. University of Newcastle
  4. Australian Research Council [DP0986194] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The double layer structure of two ionic liquids (ILs), 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium tris(pentafluoroethyl) trifluorophosphate ([Py-1,Py-4]FAP) and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate ([EMIm]FAP) at the polarized Au(111) electrode interface is probed using Atomic Force Microscopy force measurements. The force-separation profiles suggest a multilayered morphology is present at the electrified Au(111)-IL interface, with more near surface layers detected at higher potentials. At the (slightly negative) open circuit potential, multiple ion layers are present, and the innermost layer, in contact with the Au(111) surface, is enriched in the cation due to electrostatic adsorption. Upon applying negative electrode potentials (-1.0 V, -2.0 V), stronger IL near surface structure is detected: both the number of ion layers and the force required to rupture these layers increases. Positive electrode potentials (+1.0 V, +2.0 V) also enhance IL near surface structure, but not as much as negative potentials, because surface-adsorbed anions are less effective at templating structure in subsequent layers than cations. This interfacial structure is not consistent with a double layer in the Stern-Gouy-Chapman sense, as there is no diffuse layer. The structure is consistent with a capicitative double-layer model, with a very small separation distance between the planes cif charge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available