4.6 Article

Acidic Properties of Cage-Based, Small-Pore Zeolites with Different Framework Topologies and Their Silicoaluminophosphate Analogues

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 115, Issue 45, Pages 22505-22513

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp207894n

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan [21360396, 20560721]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [R0A-2007-000-20050-0]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [R0A-2007-000-20050-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20560721, 21360396] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acidic properties of cage-based, small-pore aluminosilicate zeolites with CHA, AFX, RHO, LEV, ERI, and LTA topologies and their silicoaluminophosphate (SAPO) analogues were measured by means of an ammonia IRMS (infrared/mass spectroscopy)-TPD (temperature-programmed desorption) method. All SAPO molecular sieves studied here showed weaker Bronsted acid strength (11-26 kJ mol(-1) lower in the lot heat of ammonia desorption) than their aluminosilicate counterparts. The density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the ammonia desorption energy were in good agreement with experiments; the difference in the energy of ammonia desorption was less than 10 kJ mol(-1). DFT also showed that the introduction of Al into the SiO2 framework to form aluminosilicate zeolites resulted in large changes to the distance between atoms close;100 to the acid site, while Si substitution into the AlPO4 framework to form SAPO materials I 91 predominantly modified the angles between atoms relatively far from the acid site. The introduction of Al into SiO2 frameworks causes higher compression of the Al-OH-Si bridge, inducing strongly acidic behavior, while the more flexible Al-O-P bond relaxed the compression in SAPO frameworks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available