4.6 Article

Electronic Structure of C60/Phthalocyanine/ITO Interfaces Studied using Soft X-ray Spectroscopies

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages 1928-1933

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp910504a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [CHE-0807368]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  3. EPSRC, U.K
  4. Royal Academy of Engineering
  5. EPSRC [EP/G031088/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G031088/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Division Of Chemistry
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0807368] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interface electronic structure of a bilayer heterojunction Of C-60 and three different phthalocyanines grown on indium tin oxide (ITO) has been studied using synchrotron radiation-excited photoelectron spectroscopy. The energy difference between the highest occupied molecular orbital level of the phthalocyanine (donor) layer and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital level of the C60 (acceptor) layer (E-HOMO(D) - E-LUMO(A)) was determined. The E-HOMO(D) - E-LUMO(A) of a heterojunction with boron subphthalocyanine chloride (SubPc) was found to be much larger than those of copper phthalocyanine (CuPc) and chloro-aluminum phthalocyanine (CIAIPc). This observation is discussed in terms of the difference of the ionization energy of each donor material. Additionally, we have studied the molecular orientation of the phthalocyanine films on ITO using angle-dependent X-ray absorption spectroscopy. We found that the SubPc films showed significant disorder compared to the CuPc and CIAIPc films and also found that E-HOMO(D) - E-LUMO(A) varied with the orientation of the CIAIPc molecules relative to the ITO substrate. This orientation could be controlled by varying the CIAIPc deposition rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available