4.6 Article

Tuning the Size, the Shape, and the Magnetic Properties of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages 390-396

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp1084982

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish MICINN [MAT2009-08667, CSD2006-00012]
  2. Catalan DURSI [2009SGR856]
  3. Institut Catala de Nanotecnologia (ICN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of a variety of parameters on the synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles (magnetite/maghemite Fe3O4/gamma-Fe2O3) by thermal decomposition of a metal-organic iron precursor in an organic medium is reported. We study the role of both the surfactant and the reducing agent on the shape, the size distribution, and the magnetic properties. We aim at synthesizing magnetic nanoparticles with high crystal quality and good magnetic response. A narrow size distribution of pseudospherical and faceted particles (4-20 nm) with a high saturation magnetization (M-s approximate to 80-85 emu/g at 5 K) is obtained when using oleic acid as a surfactant. In contrast, decanoic acid yields much larger pseudocubic particles (45 nm) with a wider size distribution and a larger saturation magnetization (M-s = 92 emu/g at 5 K), close to the expected value for bulk magnetite. Besides, the use of a variety of reducing agents monitors the magnetic behavior. In the case of 1,2-hexadecanediol, magnetic characterization suggests that the nanoparticles have uniform oxidation. However, those particles prepared without the use of any reducing agent also show uniform oxidation just with a slightly smaller value of the saturation magnetization (M-s = 76 emu/g at 5 K). In contrast, hydrazine seems to promote a nonuniform oxidation that results in the appearance of the exchange bias phenomenon and in a smaller saturation magnetization (M-s = 67 emu/g at 5 K). New ways to tune the shape, the size, and the magnetic properties are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available