4.6 Article

Growth Kinetics of Wall-Number Controlled Carbon Nanotube Arrays

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 114, Issue 8, Pages 3454-3458

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp911629j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Laboratory Program [R0A-2008-000-20057-0]
  2. World Class University (WCU) [R32-2008-000-10051-0]
  3. pioneer research center program [2009-0093758]
  4. Korean government [R11-2008-058-03002-0]
  5. KAIST SEWS [EEWS0903]
  6. NSF [CMMI-0802247, CMMI-0742065]
  7. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [N01090034] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  8. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-0062204, R32-2008-000-10051-0, 2008-0060005, R11-2008-058-03002-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a simple model for the growth and termination of carbon nanotube (CNT) arrays. This model was developed by modifying several submodels and provides a comprehensive predictive tool for the CNT growth process as a function of CNT wall number. Wall number, diameter, and areal density-controlled CNT arrays were grown on a reduced graphene film by combining block copolymer lithography and plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) method. The number of carbonaceous platelets required for the termination of CNT growth process was measured by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and the effective exposed catalyst surface area was measured by high magnification scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A parametric study showed that our simple kinetic model successfully predicted the kinetics of wall number-dependent CNT growth and could be used to optimize the PECVD process for CNT production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available