4.6 Article

QM/MM Study of the Effect of Local Environment on Dissociative Adsorption in BaY Zeolites

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 113, Issue 35, Pages 15643-15651

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp9020905

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division
  2. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-03ER15457]
  4. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
  5. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-03ER15457] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum chemical calculations were carried out to study the characteristics of dissociative adsorption on BaY zeolites, that is, adsorption of neutral HX versus H+X-. The calculations were performed using the QM/MM method ONIOM with the B3LYP functional, SDD basis set, and UFF force field. Key intermediates from the NOx reduction reaction were studied, including nitromethane, aci-nitromethane, acetic acid, CH2COOH, HNO3, HNO2, H2O, and O2NCH2COOH., Two factors were found to affect dissociative adsorption: the local environment in the zeolite and the acidity of the adsorbate molecule, The local environment can vary due to different aluminum arrangements around the active site. It was found that adsorbates in both neutral and dissociated forms are further stabilized as aluminum atoms are further apart because of the electrostatics. Generally, neutral intermediates adsorb with one oxygen atom coordinated to barium, whereas the dissociated intermediates adsorb with two oxygen atoms coordinated to barium in a bidentate configuration. For all of the intermediates studied except HNO3, the neutral form is favored over the dissociated form, and adsorbates with higher acidity have stronger tendencies to dissociate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available