4.6 Article

Au@ZnO core-shell nanoparticles are efficient energy acceptors with organic dye donors

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 112, Issue 31, Pages 11650-11656

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp8031308

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study highlights the efficient fluorescence resonance energy transfer from Rhodamine 6G dye to Au@ZnO core-shell nanoparticle by steady state and time-resolved spectroscopy. The calculated energy transfer efficiencies from dye to nanoparticles are 41.3, 52.6, and 72.6% for Au, mixture of Au and ZnO, and core-shell Au@ZnO nanoparticles, respectively. There is a pronounced effect on the PL quenching and a shortening of the lifetime of the dye in the presence of Au@ZnO core-shell nanoparticle which is associated with high charge storage capacity. The nonradiative decay rates are 2.80 x 10(8), 3.90 x 10(8) and 7.67 x 10(8) S-1 for pure Au, mixture of Au and ZnO and core-shell Au@ZnO nanoparticles, respectively, indicating the resonance energy transfer process. The calculated Forster distances (R-0) are 135.0 and 144.4 angstrom for Au, and core-shell Au@ZnO nanoparticles, respectively and corresponding the calculated distances (d) between the donor and acceptor are 143.05, and 123.5 angstrom. Considering the interactions of one acceptor and several donors, the calculated average distances (r(n)) between the donor and acceptor are 89.2 and 77.2 angstrom for Au and core-shell Au@ZnO nanoparticles, respectively. However, the distances between the donor and acceptor are 88.2 and 67.6 angstrom for Au and core-shell Au@ZnO nanoparticles, respectively, using the efficiency of surface energy transfer which follows a 1/d(4) distance dependence between donor and acceptor. On the basis of these finding, we may suggest that,surface energy transfer process has a more reasonable agreement with experimental finding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available