4.6 Article

Copper-catalyzed selective oxidation of methane by oxygen:: Studies on catalytic behavior and functioning mechanism of CuOx/SBA-15

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 112, Issue 35, Pages 13700-13708

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp804168y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF of China [20433030, 20625310, 20773099]
  2. National Basic Program of China [2003CB615803, 2005CB221408]
  3. Key Scientific Project of Fujian Province [2005HZ01-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While copper is the active center of particulate methane monooxygenase in methanotrophic bacteria, there are few studies to utilize synthetic copper catalysts for the selective oxidation of methane by oxygen. In this work, we have found that the copper ions attached on mesoporous silica SBA-15 with high dispersion can catalyze the selective oxidation of methane to formaldehyde by oxygen efficiently. The catalyst with a copper content of 0.008 wt % (Si/Cu = 13200) exhibits the best catalytic performance, and the specific site rate for formaldehyde formation can reach 5.6 mol (mol Cu)(-1) s(-1), significantly higher than those reported to date for other catalysts. We have elucidated that the oxidation of methane produces formaldehyde as a major primary product together with a small amount of carbon dioxide, while carbon monoxide is formed mainly via the consecutive oxidation of formaldehyde over our copper-based catalyst. Pulse reaction studies have indicated that methane molecules can react with the lattice oxygen of the catalyst, producing carbon oxides, and Cull in the catalyst is reduced at the same time. Detailed pulse reaction studies combined with EPR characterizations suggest that the reduced copper (probably Cut) sites generated by methane molecules during the reaction account for the activation of molecular oxygen, forming active oxygen species for the selective oxidation of methane to formaldehyde.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available