4.6 Article

Examination of surface adsorption of soluble surfactants by surface potential measurement at the air/solution interface

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 112, Issue 16, Pages 6398-6403

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp7108169

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface potential (Delta V) of the air/surfactant-solution interface was measured by using an ionizing Am-241 electrode method at 298.2 K, where the effect of the head groups on Delta V was also examined. Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and its homologous head group tetramethylammonium bromide (TAB) were used for examination of a cationic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium methylsulfate (CH3SO4Na), and sodium hydrogensulfate (NaHSO4) for an anionic surfactant, and octaethylene glycol mono-n-tetradecyl ether (C14E8) and octaethylene glycol (H) for a nonionic surfactant. For the cationic and nonionic systems, the surface potential of the homologous solutions gradually changed with concentration, whereas that of the corresponding surfactant solutions steeply increased up to 420 mV for CTAB at a concentration far below the critical micelle concentration (CMC), CMC/9, and up to 480 mV for C14E8 at CMC/18. For the anionic system, the surface potential traced a more complex variation with concentration. The above results indicate that the molecular arrangement of CTAB and C14E8 near the interfacial region becomes established at a concentration far below the CMC. The molecular dipole moment at the surface, derived from the surface potential, was also discussed. Change of surface tension with concentration was discussed with change in the surface potential and with preceding observations depending upon the concentrations. Finally, the Brewster angle microscopy (BAM) images of the surfactant solutions below and above the CMC and that of pure water are quite the same in darkness, which strongly indicates no adsorption of the surfactants at the air/solution interface contrary to an insoluble monolayer at the interface. This fact is substantiated by the distinct change of the BAM images in darkness for a small change in refractive index increment of the substrate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available