4.5 Article

Theoretical Insights into the Impact of Ru Catalyst Anchors on the Efficiency of Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction on Ta2O5

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 119, Issue 24, Pages 7186-7197

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp5080658

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0006527]
  2. Advanced Catalytic Transformation Program for Carbon Utilization (ACT-C) - Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0006527] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a computational Study of the dynamical and electronic structure origins of the impact of anchoring groups, PO3H2, COOH, and OH, on the efficiency of photochemical CO2 reduction in Ru(di-X-bpy)(CO)(2)Cl-2/Ta2O5 systems. Recent experimental studies indicate that the efficiency may not directly correlate with the driving force for electron transfer (ET) in these systems, prompting the need for further investigation of the role of anchor groups. Our analysis shows that there are at least two key roles of the anchor in determining the efficiency of CO2 reduction by the Ru complex. First, depending on local steric interactions, different tilting angles and their fluctuations may emerge for different anchors, affecting the magnitude of the donor-acceptor coupling. Second, depending on localization of acceptor states on the anchor, determined by the anchor's tendency to form conjugate subsystems, the yields of ET to the catalytic center may vary, directly affecting the photocatalytic efficiency. Finally, our calculations indicate that surface modeling with N-doping and many-body effects are needed to describe the ET process in the systems properly. N-doping imparts the Ta2O5 surface with a dipole moment, while Coulomb and exchange contributions to the electron-hole interaction can produce excitons that should be taken into account.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available