4.5 Article

Raman and ab Initio Investigation of Aqueous Cu(I) Chloride Complexes from 25 to 80 °C

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages 204-214

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp406580q

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Ontario Research Foundation
  3. NSERC/NRCan/AECL Joint Research Program on Supercritical-Water-Reactor Chemistry
  4. Nova Scotia Department of Economic Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Temperature-dependent Raman studies of aqueous copper(I) chloride complexes have been carried out up to 80 degrees C, along with supporting ab initio calculations for the species [CuCln(H2O)(m)](1-n), n = 0-4 and hydration numbers m = 0-6. Normalized reduced isotropic Raman spectra were obtained from perpendicular and parallel polarization measurements, with perchlorate anion, ClO4-, as an internal standard. Although the Raman spectra were not intense, spectra could be corrected by solvent baseline subtraction, to yield quantitative reduced molar scattering coefficients for the symmetric vibrational bands at 297 +/- 3 and 247 +/- 3 cm(-1). The intensity variations of these bands with concentration and temperature provided strong evidence that these arise from the species [CuCl2](-) and [CuCl3](2-), respectively. The results from ab initio calculations using density functional theory predict similar relative peak positions and intensities for the totally symmetric Cu-Cl stretching bands of the species [CuCl2(H2O)(6)](-) and [CuCl3(H2O)(6)](2-), in which the water is coordinated to the chloride ions. A less intense Raman band at 350 +/- 10 cm(-1) is attributed to the symmetric Cu-Cl stretching mode of hydrated species [CuCl(H2O)](0) with six waters of hydration. Temperature- and concentration-independent quantitative Raman molar scattering coefficients (S) are reported for the [CuCl2](-) and [CuCl3](2-) species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available