4.5 Article

Spectroscopic and Thermodynamic Comparisons of Escherichia coli DNA Photolyase and Vibrio cholerae Cryptochrome 1

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 114, Issue 20, Pages 7121-7130

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp102275r

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-0922712, MCB-0920013]
  2. Department of Chemistry at Lafayette College
  3. Lafayette ARC
  4. Division Of Chemistry
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0922712] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Escherichia coli DNA photolyase and cryptochrome I isolated from Vibrio cholerae, a member of the CRY-DASH family, are directly compared using a variety of experimental methods including UV-vis and Raman spectroscopy, reduction potential measurements, and isothermal titration calorimetry. The semiquinone form of the cryptochrome has an absorption spectrum that is red-shifted from that of the photolyase, but the Raman spectrum indicates that the FAD binding pocket is similar to that of photolyase. The FADH(-)/FADH center dot reduction potential of the cryptochrome is significantly higher than that of the photolyase at 164 mV vs NHE, but it also increases upon substrate binding (to 195 mV vs NHE), an increase similar to what is observed in photolyase. The FADH(-)/FADH center dot reduction potential for both proteins was found to be insensitive to ATP binding. Isothermal titration calorimetry found that photolyase binds tighter to substrate (K-A similar to 10(5) M-1 for photolyase and similar to 10(4) M-1 for cryptochrome 1), and the binding constants for both proteins were slightly sensitive to oxidation state. Based upon this work, it appears that this cryptochrome has significant spectroscopic and electrochemical similarities to CPD photolyase. The thermodynamic cycle of the enzymatic repair in the context of this work is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available