4.5 Article

Biophysical Properties of Membrane-Active Peptides Based on Micelle Modeling: A Case Study of Cell-Penetrating and Antimicrobial Peptides

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 114, Issue 43, Pages 13726-13735

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp1069362

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston (TcSUH)
  2. Materials & Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory
  3. Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)
  4. Texas Learning and Computation Center [TLC2]
  5. Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC)
  6. IBM Shared University Research (SUR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the molecular mechanisms of short peptides interacting with membrane-mimetic systems. Three short peptides were selected for this study: penetratin as a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP), and temporin A and KSL as antimicrobial peptides (AMP). We investigated the detailed interactions of the peptides with dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles, and the subsequent peptide insertion based on free energy calculations by using all-atomistic molecular dynamics simulations with the united atom force field and explicit solvent models. First, we found that the free energy barrier to insertion for the three peptides is dependent on the chemical composition of the micelles. Because of the favorable electrostatic interactions between the peptides and the headgroups of lipids, the insertion barrier into an SDS micelle is less than a DPC micelle. Second, the peptides' secondary structures may play a key role in their binding and insertion ability, particularly for amphiphilic peptides such as penetratin and KSL. The secondary structures with a stronger ability to bind with and insert into micelles are the ones that account for a smaller surface area of hydrophobic core, thus offering a possible criterion for peptide design with specific functionalities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available