4.7 Article

Revised experimental upper limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 92, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.092003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.K. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [T/K001329/1, ST/M003426/1, ST/L006472/1]
  2. Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders of KU Leuven [GO A/2010/10]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020-144473, 200021-126562, 200020-149211, 200020-140421]
  4. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-BLAN-0046]
  5. PL-Grid Infrastructure, Poland
  6. National Science Centre, Poland [UMO-2012/04/M/ST2/00556]
  7. STFC
  8. STFC [ST/M000753/1, ST/K000640/1, nEDM, ST/K001329/1, ST/M003426/1, ST/L006472/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020_144473, 200021_126562, 200020_149211] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  10. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K001329/1, 1656704, ST/L006472/1, ST/K001329/1 nEDM, ST/M003426/1, ST/M000753/1, ST/K000640/1, nEDM] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present for the first time a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the experimental results that set the current world sensitivity limit on the magnitude of the electric dipole moment (EDM) of the neutron. We have extended and enhanced our earlier analysis to include recent developments in the understanding of the effects of gravity in depolarizing ultracold neutrons; an improved calculation of the spectrum of the neutrons; and conservative estimates of other possible systematic errors, which are also shown to be consistent with more recent measurements undertaken with the apparatus. We obtain a net result of d(n) = -0.21 +/- 1.82 x 10(-26) e cm, which may be interpreted as a slightly revised upper limit on the magnitude of the EDM of 3.0 x 10(-26) e cm (90% C.L.) or 3.6 x 10(-26) e cm (95% C. L.).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available