4.6 Article

Theoretical Study of M+-RG2 (M+ = Li, Na, Be, Mg; RG = He-Rn)

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 117, Issue 50, Pages 13578-13590

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp4075652

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC
  2. University of Nottingham
  3. Department of Chemistry at the University of Utah
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J003921/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/J003921/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ab initio calculations were employed to determine the geometry (MP2 level), and dissociation energies [MP2 and RCCSD(T) levels], of the M-IIa(+)-RG(2) species, where M-IIa is a group 2 metal, Be or Mg, and RG is a rare gas (He-Rn). We compare the results with similar calculations on M-Ia(+)-RG(2), where M-Ia is a group 1 metal, Li or Na. It is found that the complexes involving the group 1 metals are linear (or quasilinear), whereas those involving the group 2 metals are bent. We discuss these results in terms of hybridization and the various interactions in these species. Trends in binding energies, D-e, bond lengths, and bond angles are discussed. We compare the energy required for the removal of a single RG atom from M+-RG(2) (D-e2) with that of the dissociation energy of M+-RG (D-e1); some complexes have D-e2 > D-e1 some have D-e2 < D-e1 and some have values that are about the same. We also present relaxed angular cuts through a selection of potential energy surfaces. The trends observed in the geometries and binding energies of these complexes are discussed. Mulliken, natural population, and atoms-in-molecules (AIM) population analyses are performed, and it is concluded that the AIM method is the most reliable, giving results that are in line with molecular orbital diagrams and contour plots; unphysical amounts of charge transfer are suggested by the Mulliken and natural population approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available