4.6 Article

Theoretical Views on Activation of Methane Catalyzed by Hf2+ and Oxidation of CO (x1Σ+) by N2O (x1Σ+) Catalyzed by HfO2+ and TaO2+

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 117, Issue 36, Pages 8843-8854

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp4050447

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [31070155, 11172301, 21203217]
  2. Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists of Hubei Province [2012FFA002]
  3. cojoint scientific field project
  4. Western Light Talent Culture Project
  5. Top Hundred Talents Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanisms of activation of CH4 catalyzed by Hf-1/3(2+) and oxidation of CO by N2O catalyzed by (HfO2+)-Hf-1/3 or (TaO2+)-Ta-2/4 have been investigated using the B3LYP level of theory. For the activation of methane, the TSR (two-state reactivity) mechanism has been certified through the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) calculation and the Landau-Zener-type model. In the vicinity of the minimum energy crossing point (MECP), SOC equals 900.23 cm(-1) and the probability of intersystem crossing is approximately 0.62. Spin inversion makes the activation barrier decline from 1.63 to 0.57 eV. NBO analysis demonstrates that empty 6s and 5d orbitals of the Hf atom play the major role for the activation of C-H bonds. Finally, CH4 dehydrogenates to produce Hf-CH22+. For oxidation of CO by N2O catalyzed by HfO2+ or TaO2+, the covalent bonds between transition metal atoms and the oxygen atom restrict the freedom of valence electrons. Therefore, they are all SSR (single-state reactivity). The oxygen atom is directly extracted during the course of oxygen transfer, and its microscopic essence has been discussed. The detailed kinetic information of two catalytic cycles has been calculated by referencing the energetic span (delta E) model. Finally, TOF(HfO2+)/TOF(TaO2+) = 2.7 at 298.15 K, which has a good consistency with the experimental result.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available