4.6 Article

CO Dimer: New Potential Energy Surface and Rovibrational Calculations

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 117, Issue 32, Pages 7612-7630

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp404888d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1300945]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Chemistry [1300945] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The spectrum of CO dimer was investigated by solving the rovibrational Schrodinger equation on a new potential energy surface constructed from coupled-cluster ab initio points. The Schrodinger equation was solved with a Lanczos algorithm. Several 4D (rigid monomer) global ab initio potential energy surfaces (PESs) were made using a previously reported interpolating moving least-squares (IMLS) fitting procedure specialized to describe the interaction of two linear fragments. The potential has two nonpolar minima giving rise to a complicated set of energy level stacks, which are very sensitive to the shapes and relative depths of the two wells. Although the CO dimer has defied previous attempts at an accurate purely ab initio description our best surface yields results in good agreement with experiment. Root-mean-square (rms) fitting errors of less than 0.1 cm(-1) were obtained for each of the fits using 2226 ab initio data at different levels. This allowed direct assessment of the quality of various levels of ab initio theory for prediction of spectra. Our tests indicate that standard CCSD(T) is slow to converge the interaction energy even when sextuple zeta bases as large as ACV6Z are used. The explicitly correlated CCSD(T)-F12b method was found to recover significantly more correlation energy (from singles and doubles) at the CBS limit. Correlation of the core electrons was found to be important for this system. The best PES was obtained by extrapolation of calculations at the CCSD(T)(AE)-F12b/CVnZ-F12 (n = 3,4) levels. The calculated energy levels were compared to 105 J <= 10 levels from experiment. The rrns error for 68 levels with J <= 6 is only 0.29 cm(-1). The calculated energy levels were assigned stack labels using several tools. New stacks were found. One of them, stack y(1), has an energy lower than many previously known stacks and may be observable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available