4.6 Article

Bulk, Surface, and Gas-Phase Limited Water Transport in Aerosol

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 116, Issue 45, Pages 10987-10998

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp3086667

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/G007713/1]
  2. NERC [NE/I020075/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/G007713/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. NERC [NE/I020075/1, NE/I020121/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G007713/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I020075/1, NE/I020121/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of solute species on mass transfer to and from aqueous aerosol droplets is investigated using an electrodynamic balance coupled with light scattering techniques. In particular, we explore the limitations imposed on water evaporation by slow bulk phase diffusion and by the formation of surface organic films. Measurements of evaporation from ionic salt solutions, specifically sodium chloride and ammonium sulfate, are compared with predictions from an analytical model framework, highlighting the uncertainties associated with quantifying gas diffusional transport. The influence of low solubility organic acids on mass transfer is reported and compared to both model predictions and previous work. The limiting value of the evaporation coefficient that can be resolved by this approach, when uncertainties in key thermophysical quantities are accounted for, is estimated. The limitation of slow bulk phase diffusion on the evaporation rate is investigated for gel and glass states formed during the evaporation of magnesium sulfate and sucrose droplets, respectively. Finally, the effect of surfactants on evaporation has been probed, with soluble surfactants (such as sodium dodecyl sulfate) leading to little or no retardation of evaporation through slowing of surface layer kinetics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available