4.6 Article

Theoretical Determination of the Rate Coefficient for the HO2 + HO2 → H2O2+O2 Reaction: Adiabatic Treatment of Anharmonic Torsional Effects

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 116, Issue 9, Pages 2089-2100

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp209684s

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Chemistry [1011770] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The HO2 + HO2 -> H2O2 + O-2 chemical reaction is studied using statistical rate theory in conjunction with high level ab initio electronic structure calculations. A new theoretical rate coefficient is generated that is appropriate for both high and low temperature regimes. The transition state region for the ground triplet potential energy surface is characterized using the CASPT2/CBS/aug-cc-pVTZ method with 14 active electrons and 10 active orbitals. The reaction is found to proceed through an intermediate complex bound by approximately 9.79 kcal/mol. There is no potential barrier in the entrance channel, although the free energy barrier was determined using a large Monte Carlo sampling of the HO2 orientations. The inner (tight) transition state lies below the entrance threshold. It is found that this inner transition state exhibits two saddle points corresponding to torsional conformations of the complex. A unified treatment based on vibrational adiabatic theory is presented that permits the reaction to occur on an equal footing for any value of the torsional angle. The quantum tunneling is also reformulated based on this new approach. The rate coefficient obtained is in good agreement with low temperature experimental results but is significantly lower than the results of shock tube experiments for high temperatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available