4.6 Article

Quasi-Classical Trajectory Study of the HO+CO → H+CO2 Reaction on a New ab Initio Based Potential Energy Surface

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 116, Issue 21, Pages 5057-5067

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp302278r

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-05ER15694, DE-FG02-97ER14782]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21133006]
  3. Missouri Research Board
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-97ER14782] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report extensive quasi-classical trajectory calculations of the HO + CO -> H + CO, reaction on a newly developed potential energy surface based on a large number of UCCSD(T)-F12/AVTZ calculations. This complex forming reaction is known for its unusual kinetics and dynamics because of its unique potential energy surface, which is dominated by the HOCO wells flanked by an entrance channel bottleneck and a transition state leading to the H + CO2 products. It was found that the thermal rate coefficients are in reasonably good agreement with known experimental data in both low and high pressure limits. Excitation of the OH vibration is shown to enhance reactivity, due apparently to its promoting effect over the transition state between the HOCO intermediate and the H + CO2 product. On the other hand, neither CO vibrational excitation nor rotational excitation in either CO or OH has a significant effect on reactivity, in agreement with experiment. However, significant discrepancies have been found between theory and the available molecular beam experiments. For example, the calculated translational energy distribution of the products substantially underestimates the experiment. In addition, the forward bias in the differential cross section observed in the experiment was not reproduced theoretically. While the origin of the discrepancies is still not clear, it is argued that a quantum mechanical treatment of the dynamics might be needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available