4.7 Article

Complex saddle points and disorder lines in QCD at finite temperature and density

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.054004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bielefeld Young Researcher's Fund
  2. U.S. Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The properties and consequences of complex saddle points are explored in phenomenological models of QCD at nonzero temperature and density. Such saddle points are a consequence of the sign problem and should be considered in both theoretical calculations and lattice simulations. Although saddle points in finite-density QCD are typically in the complex plane, they are constrained by a symmetry that simplifies analysis. We model the effective potential for Polyakov loops using two different potential terms for confinement effects and consider three different cases for quarks: very heavy quarks, massless quarks without modeling of chiral symmetry breaking effects, and light quarks with both deconfinement and chiral symmetry restoration effects included in a pair of Polyakov-Nambu-Jona Lasinio models. In all cases, we find that a single dominant complex saddle point is required for a consistent description of the model. This saddle point is generally not far from the real axis; the most easily noticed effect is a difference between the Polyakov loop expectation values < TrFP > and < TrFP dagger >, and that is confined to a small region in the mu - T plane. In all but one case, a disorder line is found in the region of critical and/or crossover behavior. The disorder line marks the boundary between exponential decay and sinusoidally modulated exponential decay of correlation functions. Disorder line effects are potentially observable in both simulation and experiment. Precision simulations of QCD in the mu - T plane have the potential to clearly discriminate between different models of confinement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available