4.6 Article

Structure and NMR Spectra of Some [2.2]Paracyclophanes. The Dilemma of [2.2]Paracyclophane Symmetry

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 115, Issue 38, Pages 10638-10649

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp205693a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling of Warsaw University [G28-7]
  2. Norwegian Supercomputing Program [nn4654K]
  3. Innovative Economy Operational Programme Grants for Innovation
  4. Research Council of Norway [179568/V30, 177558/V00]
  5. National Science Council, Taipei

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Density functional theory (DFT) quantum chemical calculations of the structure and NMR parameters for highly strained hydrocarbon [2.2]paracyclophane 1 and its three derivatives are presented. The calculated NMR parameters are compared with the experimental ones. By least-squares fitting of the H-1 spectra, almost all J(HH) coupling constants could be obtained with high accuracy. Theoretical vicinal J(HH) couplings in the aliphatic bridges, calculated using different basis sets (6-311G(d,p), and Huz-IV) reproduce the experimental values with essentially the same root-mean-square (rms) error of about 1.3 Hz, regardless of the basis set used. These discrepancies could be in part due to a considerable impact of rovibrational effects on the observed J(HH) couplings, since the latter show a measurable dependence on temperature. Because of the lasting literature controversies concerning the symmetry of parent compound 1, D-2h versus D-2, a critical analysis of the relevant literature data is carried out. The symmetry issue is prone to confusion because, according to some literature claims, the two hypothetical enantiomeric D-2 structures of 1 could be separated by a very low energy barrier that would explain the occurrence of rovibrational effects on the observed vicinal J(HH) couplings. However, the D-2h symmetry of 1 with a flat energy minimum could also account for these effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available