4.6 Article

An approach to hydration of model silica materials by exploring their multiple minima hypersurfaces. The role of entropy of association

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 112, Issue 13, Pages 2880-2887

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp710583n

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of molecular water on the structure and formation of silica clusters is modeled with the use of the MMH (multiple minima hypersurfaces) approach. It combines quantum chemical Hamiltonians for the calculation of the internal energy with statistical modeling and formulas for the calculation of thermodynamic functions of association. The structures of the most probable clusters of hydration and some proper-ties of the association with water are proposed. Different simple structures are calculated to consider the entropy of association in place of the simpler approach of a single global minimum. Ab initio, DFT, and semiempirical calculations of the structures and relevant reactions of silica fragments are also reported, confirming the reliability of the results on very different grounded quantum mechanical methods. Particularly, it has been shown that semiempirical PM3 Hamiltonian is reliable for silica cluster calculations of this kind, in comparison with accurate ab initio SCF and other DFT calculations. Apparently, the well-known systematic failures of this Hamiltonian are absent in this kind of structures and interactions. The increasing hydrophobic character of neutral silica clusters appears as a result of the free energies of association, and therefore, it originates on entropy. It is remarkable that the simple global minimum approach currently used in works of molecular modeling on this kind of compounds, where several hydrogen bridges have a place to exist with several different conformations, must be taken with caution given the remarkable entropy of association of such systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available