4.5 Article

MOLECULAR AND MORPHOLOGICAL CRITERIA FOR REVISION OF THE GENUS MICROCOLEUS (OSCILLATORIALES, CYANOBACTERIA)

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages 1167-1180

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12128

Keywords

Cyanobacteria; Microcoleus; molecular evaluation; morphology; Phormidium; phylogeny; taxonomy

Funding

  1. KONTAKT ME [934]
  2. [INGO LA 341]
  3. [LM2010009 CzechPolar]
  4. [AV0Z600 50516]
  5. [P506/12/1818]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ninety-two strains of Microcoleus vaginatus (=nomenclatural-type species of the genus Microcoleus Desmazieres ex Gomont) and Phormidium autumnale Trevisan ex Gomont from a wide diversity of regions and biotopes were examined using a combination of morphological and molecular methods. Phylogenies based on the 16S rDNA and 16S-23S ITS (partial) demonstrated that the 92 strains, together with a number of strains in GenBank, were members of a highly supported monophyletic clade of strains (Bayesian posterior probability = 1.0) distant from the species-cluster containing the generitype of Phormidium. Similarity of the 16S rRNA gene exceeded 95.5% among all members of the Microcoleus clade, but was less than 95% between any Microcoleus strains and species outside of the clade (e.g., Phormidium sensu stricto). These findings, which are in agreement with earlier studies on these taxa, necessitate the revision of Microcoleus to include P.autumnale. Furthermore, the cluster of Phormidium species in the P.autumnale group (known as Group VII) must be moved into Microcoleus as well, and these nomenclatural transfers are included in this study. The main diacritical characters defining Microcoleus are related to the cytomorphology of trichomes, including: narrowed trichome ends, calyptra, cells shorter than wide up to more or less isodiametric, and facultative presence of sheaths. The majority of species are 4-10m in diameter. The possession of multiple trichomes in a common sheath is present facultatively in many but not all species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available