4.5 Article

NICHE PARTITIONING AND THE COEXISTENCE OF TWO CRYPTIC DICTYOTA (DICTYOTALES, PHAEOPHYCEAE) SPECIES FROM THE CANARY ISLANDS

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 1075-1087

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00912.x

Keywords

Canary Islands; cryptic species; Dictyota cymatophila; Dictyota dichotoma; niche partitioning; phenology; reproductive ecology

Funding

  1. Agencia Canaria de Investigacion, Innovacion y Sociedad de la Informacion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coexistence in a homogeneous environment requires species to specialize in distinct niches. Sympatry of cryptic species is of special interest to both ecologists and evolutionary biologists because the mechanisms that facilitate their persistent coexistence are obscure. In this study, we report on two sympatric Dictyota species, D. dichotoma (Huds.) J. V. Lamour. and the newly described species D. cymatophila sp. nov., from the Canary Islands. Gene sequence data (rbcL, psbA, nad1, cox1, cox3, and LSU rDNA) demonstrate that D. dichotoma and D. cymatophila do not represent sister species. Rather, D. cymatophila and D. dichotoma have converged on a nearly identical morphology, only to be distinguished with detailed morphometric observations. Both species co-occur in eulittoral pools and the shallow subtidal in Tenerife. Even though D. cymatophila was more dominant in wave-exposed places and D. dichotoma in less exposed areas, the spatial distribution of both species overlapped in intermediate habitats. The species display radically different phenologies. D. dichotoma reached its highest density in winter and early spring and disappeared nearly completely in autumn, while D. cymatophila dominated the study site from July until November. The timing of gamete release also differs between both species, D. dichotoma releasing gametes twice every lunar cycle, while the release of gametes in D. cymatophila occurred roughly every other day.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available