4.6 Article

Reactive oxygen species produced by irradiation of some phthalocyanine derivatives

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2009.11.016

Keywords

Singlet oxygen; Photosensitizer; Phthalocyanine; Quantum yield

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [2B06104]
  2. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [KAN400720701]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative study of the reliability of methods used for the determination of singlet oxygen was carried out. The water iodide method, as well as the methods using 9,10-dimethylanthracene (DMA) and 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPIBF) in dimethyformanide (DMF) solutions, was used for the detection of singlet oxygen (1)O(2) production in eight phthalocyanine photosensitizers. The iodide method is not only selective for the determination of (1)O(2) but can also be used for the determination of other oxygen species. In addition, the results of the iodide method are affected by a possible formation of phthalocyanine dinners and by post-irradiation reactions. On the other hand, both the methods using indicators in DMF are highly selective for the determination of (1)O(2). The quantum yield of the singlet oxygen production was determined for eight phthalocyanine derivatives; the following sequence was obtained: 5 similar to 4 > 7 similar to 2 similar to 8 (standard) > 6 > 3 similar to 1, where 5 represents the ammonium salt of disulphonated zinc phthalocyanine, 4 sulphonated zinc phthalocyanine 1(3-diethylammonium)-propylsulphonamide citrate, 7 tetrakis(trimethylammonium)zinc phthalocyanine tetraiodide, 2 tetrakis(N-methylpyridinium-3-oxy)zinc phthalocyanine tetraiodide, 8 zinc phthalocyanine,6 sodium salt of disulphonated aluminum phthalocyanine,3 sulphonated aluminum phthalocyanine [(N-2-hydroxyethyl)aminoethylsulphonamide] and 1 tetra-methylenepyridinium chloride of hydroxyaluminum phthalocyanine. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available