4.4 Article

Chalcone-based derivatives as new scaffolds for hA3 adenosine receptor antagonists

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages 697-703

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jphp.12028

Keywords

adenosine receptor; chalcone; coumarin-chalcone hybrids; structureactivity relationship

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo [PS09/00501]
  2. Xunta de Galicia (Spain) [PGIDIT09CSA030203PR]
  3. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) (Portugal) [PTDC/QUI-QUI/113687/2009]
  4. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [AP2008-04263]
  5. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/61262/2009]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/61262/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives With the aim of finding new adenosine receptor (AR) ligands based on the chalcone scaffold, we report the synthesis of a new series of coumarinchalcone hybrids and the pharmacological characterization of their actions at four subtypes of AR. Methods The synthesized compounds 510 were characterized in radioligand binding (A1, A2A and A3) and adenylyl cyclase activity assays (A2B) to determine the affinity of the compounds for the four human AR (hAR) subtypes. Key findings Coumarinchalcone hybrids were found to be ligands with a novel structure, not reported thus far, that showed varying affinity and selectivity for AR subtypes. Conclusions The coumarinchalcone hybrids in which ring B of the chalcone scaffold was a thiophene (compounds 5 and 9) were found to be the most potent compounds of the series. Compound 9, in which ring A of the chalcone moiety was the phenyl ring of the coumarin, showed similar activity against hA1, hA2A and hA3 ARs, while compound 5, in which ring A of the chalcone was substituted by the benzopyrone ring of the coumarin moiety, showed similar activity only at the hA3 AR and, therefore, was deemed to be selective (Ki (dissociation constant)=5160nm).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available