4.4 Review

Intestinal transporters for endogenic and pharmaceutical organic anions: the challenges of deriving in-vitro kinetic parameters for the prediction of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 11, Pages 1523-1548

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01505.x

Keywords

in-vitro models; intestinal membrane transporters; kinetic parameters; organic anions; prediction of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives This review provides an overview of intestinal human transporters for organic anions and stresses the need for standardization of the various in-vitro methods presently employed in drugdrug interaction (DDI) investigations. Key findings Current knowledge on the intestinal expression of the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT), the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), the monocarboxylate transporters (MCT) 1, MCT3-5, the multidrug resistance associated proteins (MRP) 16, the organic anion transporting polypetides (OATP) 2B1, 1A2, 3A1 and 4A1, and the organic solute transporter a/beta (OSTa/beta) has been covered along with an overview of their substrates and inhibitors. Furthermore, the many challenges in predicting clinically relevant DDIs from in-vitro studies have been discussed with focus on intestinal transporters and the various methods for deducting in-vitro parameters for transporters (Km/Ki/IC50, efflux ratio). The applicability of using a cut-off value (estimated based on the intestinal drug concentration divided by the Ki or IC50) has also been considered. Summary A re-evaluation of the current approaches for the prediction of DDIs is necessary when considering the involvement of other transporters than P-glycoprotein. Moreover, the interplay between various processes that a drug is subject to in-vivo such as translocation by several transporters and dissolution should be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available