4.4 Article

Effects of isoflurane on learning and memory functions of wild-type and glutamate transporter type 3 knockout mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 302-307

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2011.01404.x

Keywords

glutamate transporters; isoflurane; learning; memory; mice

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland [GM065211]
  2. International Anesthesia Research Society, Cleveland, Ohio
  3. American Heart Association Mid-Atlantic Affiliate, Baltimore, Maryland [10GRNT3900019]
  4. Robert M. Epstein Professorship endowment, University of Virginia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives General anesthetics may contribute to the post-operative cognitive dysfunction. This study was designed to determine the effects of isoflurane on the learning and memory of healthy animals or animals with a decreased brain antioxidative capacity. Methods Seven-to nine-week-old female CD-1 wild-type mice or glutamate transporter type 3 (EAAT3) knockout mice whose brains have a decreased glutathione level were exposed to or were not exposed to 1.3% isoflurane for 2 h. They were subjected to fear conditioning or Barnes maze tests 1 week later. Key findings The EAAT3 knockout mice had less freezing behaviour than the wild-type mice in tone-related fear. Isoflurane did not affect the freezing behaviour of the wild-type and EAAT3 knockout mice. The time for the wild-type and EAAT3 knockout mice to identify the target hole in the training sessions and memory test with the Barnes maze was not affected by isoflurane. However, the EAAT3 knockout mice took longer to identify the target hole than the wild-type mice in these tests. Conclusions These results suggest that EAAT3 knockout mice have significant cognitive impairment. Isoflurane may not significantly affect the cognition of wild-type and EAAT3 knockout mice in a delayed phase after isoflurane exposure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available