4.4 Article

Preparation, characterisation and anti-tumour activity of Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 139-144

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1211/jpp.62.01.0016

Keywords

chitosan; cytotoxicity; Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide; nanoparticle; immune stimulation

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2006C23015]
  2. Ministry of Health-Medical Science Critical Technological Program of Zhejiang Province, China [WKJ2008-2-029]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB930300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives The aim was to prepare novel Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide nanoparticles and to evaluate the physicochemical properties and anti-tumour activity in in-vitro cytotoxicity studies using HepG2, HeLa and A549 cancer cell lines, and growth promotion effects oil mouse spleen cells. Methods Chitosan nanoparticles loaded with G. lucidum polysaccharide were prepared using the ion-revulsion method. The diameter distribution of the particles and the surface charge were measured using a zetasizer analyser. The entrapment efficiency and drug loading capacity were examined by the diethylaminoethanol weak anion exchange method. The cytotoxic effects of nanoparticles on tumour cells and the growth promotion effects oil mouse spleen cells were tested using the MTT assay. Key findings Nanoparticles loaded with G. lucidum polysaccharide at 6 mu g/ml and chitosan/sodium tripolyphosphate (mass) ratio of 5.5 had significantly greater cytotoxic effects on tumour cells and growth promotion effects oil mouse spleen cells than empty nanoparticles. Conclusions G. lucidum polysaccharide nanoparticles showed significant anti-tumour efficacy, having both cytotoxic effects on tumour cells and growth promotion effects on spleen cells, making it a promising candidate in the clinical setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available