4.7 Article

Measurement of the e+e- → ηJ/ψ cross section and search for e+e- → π0J/ψ at center-of-mass energies between 3.810 and 4.600 GeV

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 91, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.112005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2015CB856700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [10935007, 11121092, 11125525, 11235011, 11322544, 11335008, 11375170, 11275189, 11079030, 11475164, 11005109, 11475169]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Large-Scale Scientific Facility Program
  4. Joint Large-Scale Scientific Facility Funds of the NSFC and CAS [11179007, U1232201, U1332201]
  5. CAS [KJCX2-YW-N29, KJCX2-YW-N45]
  6. 100 Talents Program of CAS
  7. INPAC and the Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology
  8. German Research Foundation DFG [Collaborative Research Center CRC-1044]
  9. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Italy
  10. Ministry of Development of Turkey [DPT2006K-120470]
  11. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [14-07-91152]
  12. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-04ER41291, DE-FG02-05ER41374, DE-FG02-94ER40823, DESC0010118]
  13. U.S. National Science Foundation
  14. University of Groningen (RuG) and the Helmholtzzentrum fuer Schwerionenforschung GmbH (GSI), Darmstadt
  15. WCU Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea [R32-2008-000-10155-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using data samples collected with the BESIII detector operating at the BEPCII collider at 17 center-of-mass energies from 3.810 to 4.600 GeV, we perform a study of e(+)e(-) -> eta J/psi and pi(0)J/psi The Born cross sections of these two processes are measured at each center-of-mass energy. The measured energy-dependent Born cross section for e(+)e(-) -> eta J/psi shows an enhancement around 4.2 GeV. The measurement is compatible with an earlier measurement by Belle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available