4.5 Article

High-throughput melting-temperature analysis of a monoclonal antibody by differential scanning fluorimetry in the presence of surfactants

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 415-428

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jps.23405

Keywords

proteins; stability; protein formulation; high throughput technologies; surfactants; thermal analysis; fluorescence spectroscopy; calorimetry (DSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) is successfully used as a high-throughput screening method for the analysis of the protein melting temperature (Tm) in the development of therapeutic monoclonal antibody (MAb) formulations. Typically, surfactants are utilized in MAb formulations as a stabilizer, but the commonly applied polarity-sensitive dye SYPRO (R) Orange shows bright fluorescence in the presence of micelles, concealing the signal of protein unfolding. Studying various MAb formulations containing polysorbate 20, polysorbate 80, or poloxamer 188 (PX 188), the molecular rotor probe 4-(dicyanovinyl)julolidine (DCVJ) was investigated. Although limited to higher MAb concentrations, DCVJ enabled the determination of Tm in many formulations where SYPRO (R) Orange failed. It is important to note that careful background correction of placebo formulations is essential for the precise determination of Tm and especially Tm onset. Thermal shifts of Tm1 (lowest observed thermal transition) indicating stabilizing or destabilizing effects of pH or excipient were in good agreement across all tested formulations and correlated well with differential scanning calorimetry measurements. Additionally, the micellization temperature of PX 188 was confirmed, which leads to a nonproteinous transition. With this new method, it is possible to apply DSF during the development of therapeutic proteins in surfactant-containing formulations. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 102:415428, 2013

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available