4.5 Article

Analytical protein a chromatography as a quantitative tool for the screening of methionine oxidation in monoclonal antibodies

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages 4248-4257

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.23286

Keywords

analytical biochemistry; antibody degradation; bioanalysis; Fc domain; HPLC (high-performance; pressure liquid chromatography); high-throughput technologies; oxidation; methionine; protein A binding; separation science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of oxidized methionine residues in therapeutic monoclonal antibodies can potentially impact drug efficacy, safety, as well as antibody half-life in vivo. Therefore, methionine oxidation of antibodies is a strong focus during pharmaceutical development and a well-known degradation pathway. The monitoring of methionine oxidation is currently routinely performed by peptide mapping/liquid chromatographymass spectrometry techniques, which are laborious and time consuming. We have established analytical protein A chromatography as a method of choice for fast and quantitative screening of total Fc methionine oxidation during formulation and process development. The principle of this method relies on the lower binding affinity of protein A for immunoglobulin GFc domains containing oxidized methionines, compared with nonoxidized Fc domains. Our data reveal that highly conserved Fc methionines situated close to the binding site to protein A can serve as marker for the oxidation of other surface-exposed methionine residues. In case of poor separation of oxidized species by protein A chromatography, analytical protein G chromatography is proposed as alternative. We demonstrate that analytical protein A chromatography, and alternatively protein G chromatography, is a valuable tool for the screening of methionine oxidation in therapeutic antibodies during formulation and process development. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 101:42484257, 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available