4.5 Article

Freeze-Drying of Nanosuspensions, 1: Freezing Rate Versus Formulation Design as Critical Factors to Preserve the Original Particle Size Distribution

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages 1958-1968

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.22425

Keywords

Freeze-drying; Lyophilization; Nanosuspensions; Nanoparticles; Stabilization; Particle size; Factorial designNanotechnology; Excipients

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been recently reported in the literature that using a fast freezing rate during freeze-drying of drug nanosuspensions is beneficial to preserve the original particle size distribution. All freezing rates studied were obtained by utilizing a custom-made apparatus and were then indirectly related to conventional vial freeze-drying. However, a standard freeze-dryer is only capable of achieving moderate freezing rates in the shelf fluid circulation system. Therefore, it was the purpose of the present study to evaluate the possibility to establish a typical freezing protocol applicable to a standard freeze-drying unit in combination with an adequate choice of cryoprotective excipients and steric stabilizers to preserve the original particle size distribution. Six different drug nanosuspensions containing itraconazole as a drug model were studied using freeze-thaw experiments and a full factorial design to reveal major factors for the stabilization of drug nanosuspensions and the corresponding interactions. In contrast to previous reports, the freezing regime showed no significant influence on preserving the original particle size distribution, suggesting that the concentrations of both the steric stabilizer and the cryoprotective agent are optimized. Moreover, it could be pinpointed that the combined effect of steric stabilizer and cryoprotectant clearly contribute to nanoparticle stability. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 100: 1958-1968, 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available